Penguin Random House, Authors Guild on Book Bannings

In News, Opinion & Commentary by Porter Anderson2 Comments

As book-bannings sweep the United States, two campaigns from the industry demonstrate different styles and tones of response.

A detail from Raphael López’s ‘Open Books, Open Doors’ poster for Penguin Random House and its partners. Image: PRH

By Porter Anderson, Editor-in-Chief | @Porter_Anderson

McIntosh: ‘For an Informed and Engaged Democracy’
Not unlike the effect of the Supreme Court’s leaked draft on Roe v. Wade, proliferating efforts at blocking books from school curricula and libraries’ shelves seem to be alerting many in the States’ books and publishing industry to the extent of the censorship challenge. The American Library Association cites 1,597 titles targeted in 2021 alone, estimating that many more instances have gone uncounted.

The Nashville Public Library’s new limited-edition library card. Image: NPL

Today (May 5), reports describe a new response, the Nashville Public Library’s release of a library card emblazoned with “I Read Banned Books With My Library Card,” a message delivered in classic superhero-aesthetic bravura. Here’s Jaclyn Peiser’s write-up for the Washington Post.

The limited-edition library card has been introduced after a Tennessee Republican state lawmaker said during a state-legislative debate that he’d be willing to burn books, even as some politicians have worked to gain oversight of school librarians’ inventories. And yet Peiser reports a Library Association survey’s finding that “71 percent of voters across the political spectrum oppose book bans.”

Amid the furor rising with spring temperatures, Penguin Random House this week has highlighted a broad partnership with School Library Journal; PEN America; the National Coalition Against Censorship; the National Council of Teachers of English; #Freadom Fighters; and Library Journal. The intention, as media messaging from Penguin Random House and those aligned entities has it, is to “emphasize the importance of free expression as book bans and challenges spread across the country.”

The campaign’s slogan, “Open Books, Open Doors,” may remind some of Sharjah’s theme for its 2019 UNESCO World Book Capital from the International Publishers Association president Bodour Al Qasimi, an apt iteration: “Open Books, Open Minds.

The PRH-led artwork speaks softly and carries metaphorical hints at the precise issue at hand. On the poster’s reverse side, if a viewer knows to look, or can, the piece directs viewers to the publisher’s “Banned Books Resources Hub.” There you find recommended articles, essays, and other content for librarians, for educators, for parents, for students, for authors and illustrators, although not for fellow publishers—who have at times found themselves facing arguments from their own staffers against the acquisitions of books by “problematic authors.”

The PRH poster’s resources page also lists more than 100 Penguin Random House books that have been targets of banning efforts, from Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night to Ocean Vuong’s On Earth We’re Briefly Gorgeous, and from DH Lawrence’s Women in Love to Jack London’s The Call of the Wild.

The field is a wide one. The arrival of a delicately turned 18-by-24-inch poster by Sonia Sotomayor’s Just Ask illustrator Rafael López may make its best contribution by helping to frame an important question: when are straightforward speech and a frank shout-out of alarm more appropriate than billowing rainbow colors and floating fern fronds?

The integrity of the intent is clear. Madeline McIntosh, CEO of Penguin Random House US, is quoted, saying, “At Penguin Random House, we believe reading is essential for an informed and engaged democracy.

Madeline McIntosh

“Even—and perhaps most especially—the youngest members of our society benefit by learning about the world through books that showcase a diverse range of perspectives and experiences.

“We’re proud to come together with School Library Journal and our vital partners to support the freedom to read.”

Etienne Veber, CEO of MSI, the parent company of School Library Journal, is quoted here, too, saying, “We’re honored to stand with our partners through this important project to amplify the importance of the freedom to read.

Etienne Veber

“Fostering lifelong learning by connecting readers to high quality books is at the heart of what we do.

“We support and believe in the power of reading widely and freely to engage readers of all ages and make a better world for all.”

López’s charming poster is being included in this month’s issue of Veber’s School Library Journal. But some, of course, might worry that this is distribution to the choir. In addition, “a limited run of printed poster copies will be available to educators, librarians, and parents at select industry events and retail locations throughout the summer,” per PRH’s announcement to journalists.

Coming just months after Penguin Random House worldwide CEO Markus Dohle personally seeded a US$500,000 “Book Defense Fund” at PEN America, the introduction of a winsome image and resources guidance can be a cool hand on a hot forehead. There’s never anything wrong with pointing out the luminous value of reading and the indispensable grace of literature.

It’s hard to imagine, however, that many citizens engaged in book-banning efforts are seeing the poster in May’s School Library Journal.

Another Approach: The Authors Guild’s Banned Book Club

The image on a story by Mariana Alfaro and Amy B. Wang at the Washington Post last week—about that same book-burning comment in the Tennessee legislative ranks—is hard to look at. But it captures the concern reflected in the Authors Guild‘s new response.

The Authors Guild’s Banned Book Club is to feature a monthly work of fiction or nonfiction ‘ recently barred in one or more U.S. school districts or states.’ Image: AG

The leading American writer-advocacy organization of some 11,000 members has rolled out a Banned Books Club on the social reading app Fable.

The club is scheduled to feature a monthly work of fiction or nonfiction, titles “recently barred in one or more US school districts or states.” This month, the inaugural focus book is David Levithan’s Two Boys Kissing. The Guild introduces Levithan’s book, writing, “The novel ranks No. 18 on the American Library Association’s Top 100 Most Banned and Challenged Books of the past decade.” It’s about two 17-year-olds in a 32-hour kissing marathon for Guinness World Records.

That, too, is a Penguin Random House title. And another Big Five house, Hachette, has provided a grant to support the Guild’s Banned Books Club.

Soft Touch, Hard Reality

Two approaches to one growing problem: here’s a book club that puts the phrase banned books right into your face, and a social media campaign the glowing key image of which doesn’t mention censorship. The contrast between these two approaches and among many other modes of response is something to consider.

Each member of the world reading community needs to decide whether radiant colors and tender children at doorways or issue-driven literature and forthright debate are more important at a time when the Philadelphia Inquirer has announced that Pennsylvania “ranks near the top nationally in book-banning activity.”

This, as author Dave Eggers has offered high-school seniors in South Dakota free copies of his The Circle (Penguin Random House/Knopf), removed from district schools, as the Associated Press has reported this evening.

The right wing is not mincing words. Just run a search online for news stories related to “book bannings.” It’s difficult to think that the activists moving against reading are intent on leaving any doors, or minds, open.

The Guild’s response is a “toolkit” of suggestions for those who’d like to speak up. Others will prefer the soft beauty of a child’s wonder on an #OpenBooksOpenDoors poster.

What world publishing must face is that all approaches may well be needed. This is not a drill. And it may not be enough to preach to librarians and others who already are deep in these trenches and taking the hostility full in the face.


More from Publishing Perspectives on the freedom of expression is here, more on the freedom to publish is here, more on banned books is here, more on Penguin Random House is here, more on Hachette is here, and more on censorship is here.

More from us on the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on international book publishing is here.

About the Author

Porter Anderson

Facebook Twitter Google+

Porter Anderson is a non-resident fellow of Trends Research & Advisory, and he has been named International Trade Press Journalist of the Year in London Book Fair's International Excellence Awards. He is Editor-in-Chief of Publishing Perspectives. He formerly was Associate Editor for The FutureBook at London's The Bookseller. Anderson was for more than a decade a senior producer and anchor with CNN.com, CNN International, and CNN USA. As an arts critic (National Critics Institute), he was with The Village Voice, the Dallas Times Herald, and the Tampa Tribune, now the Tampa Bay Times. He co-founded The Hot Sheet, a newsletter for authors, which now is owned and operated by Jane Friedman.

Comments

  1. In writing about the “Open Books, Open Doors” poster initiative of Penguin Random House and School Library Journal, Porter Anderson critiques the effort as “distribution to the choir.”
    What he fails to see is the end user of the campaign. (This being a publishing perspective, I suppose.) The poster image reflecting the import—and yes, beauty—of free expression is not intended for librarians, but students, children and teens, and school communities.
    Signage is important in libraries and in SLJ’s experience of covering the field, we know that images and graphics have been used to promote the library as a welcoming place for all. In my recent reporting on GLSEN’s efforts, I learned that graphics they provide are doing just that and being used, enthusiastically, in libraries to support and encourage LBTQIA+ students.
    It should be noted that the poster and its message are not limited to libraries, but widely available for anyone to download, share, and discuss: https://www.slj.com/page/readfree.

    SLJ reiterates our pride in partnering with Penguin Random House, PEN America, the National Coalition Against Censorship, the National Council of Teachers of English, FReadom, and Library Journal in this effort. This coalition itself presents a powerful message to the world, including the publishing community, of our united stance on intellectual freedom.
    And we remain engaged in service to our core audience, and reaffirm this project as supporting the choir, reminding the choir, and sharing with the choir and their constituents the message—“billowing rainbow colors and floating fern fronds,” and all—of the vital importance of the freedom to read.

    1. Author

      Hi, Kathy,
      Good to hear from you, thank you, I hope you’re well.

      There’s no question that you and School Library Journal’s partners should be proud of this effort. And, as you say very well, images and graphic design are essential.

      If someone sees this campaign in a library or elsewhere and doesn’t know, as you do, that the message is related to book bannings and to freedom of expression, what she or he will see is a superb poster that rightly extols the values and wonder of reading. Its implications for LGBTQ+ viewers are welcoming and supportive, just as you say, and this is excellent.

      And yet the important information from the extensive Penguin Random House Banned Books Resource Hub is on the back of the poster. How many people will think to look at the back of a poster? And if they do think of that, how often is it even possible to examine the back of a poster, pending how it’s displayed?

      We’re in agreement on the importance of this imagery, the quality of its aesthetics, and the worthiness of the effort, absolutely. But for those who don’t know its intended mission, does it land its most urgent point about the States’ alarming surge in censorship? — those “book bans and challenges spreading across the country,” as the press information about it says?

      Thanks again for your note, and for the work you’re doing.
      All the best,
      -p.

Leave a Comment