Charkin To Bezos: ‘Our Industry Should Salute You, and Kick Back’

In News, Opinion & Commentary by Richard Charkin9 Comments

In his column today, Richard Charkin’s ‘Dear Jeff’ letter captures the publishing industry’s perennially conflicted viewpoints on Amazon.

Shopping at London’s Walthamstow market on November 3. Image – iStockphoto: Victor Huang

Editor’s note: The weeklong FutureBook conference, opening today (November 16) will on Tuesday feature an interview with Andy Hunter, the American entrepreneur behind the platform. As Publishing Perspectives readers will recall, allows independent bookstores to have their own pages for digital sales from which they get 30 percent. This month, the program has opened in the UK with at least 130 shops. At this writing, the UK site says that £160,058 (US$211,585) has been raised for local booksellers. –Porter Anderson  

By Richard Charkin | @RCharkin

‘I Have Some Reservations’
This is a time for risk-taking. The status quo is changing and we must adapt.

In that spirit, I’ve taken a risk of offending old friends in the publishing world with this open letter to Jeff Bezos and the book trade in general.

Dear Mr. Bezos and colleagues:

I have followed the amazing Amazon story from a publisher’s point of view since the very early days. My admiration for the extraordinary entrepreneurial success and for the focus on customer satisfaction has always been tempered by Amazon’s potential damage to the overall book trade, of which I’ve been a long-standing participant in various roles.

Richard Charkin

I was prompted to write this after a friend sent me a link to her new e-commerce platform whose purpose was “to avoid enriching Mr Bezos.”

This coincided with the launch here in the United Kingdom of to support independent bookshops by creating a white-label, affordable e-commerce platform. This initiative, following on from its successful launch in the United States, has been greeted by the book trade with enormous enthusiasm and is regularly posting impressive-sounding sales figures. Hooray, I say. Anything that creates new avenues for the distribution of books is to be welcomed.

I do, however, have some reservations.

Some of this enthusiasm is, in my opinion, simply antipathy to Amazon, sometimes tacit, sometimes more open. This is a misconception.

There’s no way that will ever compete with Amazon for customer satisfaction. Not least, it will never be able to offer the breadth of products that are available through Amazon—music, video, printing machines, stationery, food. Nor will the revenue generated for an individual independent bookseller save it from the spiraling costs of COVID-19 security, empty high streets, deteriorating economies and all the other effects of the current, and I fear continuing, crisis.

“I believe we should be clear-eyed about the absolute importance of Amazon and its subsidiaries.”Richard Charkin

And will certainly not damage Amazon itself. In fact, I imagine the strategists in Seattle welcome such initiatives as “proof” that Amazon is simply a normal player in a highly competitive market.

That said, Amazon itself has much to answer for.

I’ve spent large swaths of time and effort trying to protect our industry and the business I work for from the threat of a dominant retailer imposing unreasonable trading terms and laying waste to the vibrant and multidimensional book trade. I’ve suffered standoffs in which Amazon removed “buy buttons.” I’ve had a public slanging match with the founder of Audible, my good friend Don Katz.

Our industry has had to deal with Amazon’s occasionally liberal interpretation of territorial rights; the pressure to use Amazon’s print services; the requirement to pay large amounts in co-op advertising which has never proved financially sensible for the publisher; attempts to force subscription services on publishers; and the subtle use of a dominant market position which, interestingly, is now being addressed by the European Union’s competition authorities.

In addition, there’s a widespread belief that Amazon’s tax planning is at the “aggressive” end of the spectrum and that its relations with its workforce, particularly the lower-paid workers, are questionable.

“ will certainly not damage Amazon itself. In fact, I imagine the strategists in Seattle welcome such initiatives.”Richard Charkin

That said—and I shall continue to argue about these and other matters—I want to extend a huge thank you to Amazon, Audible, Abe Books, Kindle Direct Publishing, and the rest for everything you and your team have done to allow the book trade to function effectively throughout the COVID-19 crisis.

Doubtless, there will be authors, brick-and-mortar booksellers, and traditional publishers complaining about the additional market share you’ll have taken. I can empathize with them, but I believe we should be clear-eyed about the absolute importance of Amazon and its subsidiaries.

You have invested enormously and at risk to create what you have created. You have made an incredibly generous gift to the UK Book Trade Benevolent Society. I believe your well-endowed foundation in the United States will similarly give back some of the money earned from books.

Without Amazon in all its aspects, I cannot imagine how many authors and publishers would have been able to cope with the last many months of variants of lockdown. You have saved our industry, and I believe our industry should salute you and your teams, as well as continue to kick back against the negative aspects.

Kind regards,
Richard Charkin

The World’s End in Camden Town, London, a pub closed in the current British government COVID-19 restrictions. Image, November 12 – iStockphoto: VV Shots

Join us monthly for Richard Charkin’s latest column. More coverage of his work from Publishing Perspectives is here. More on the UK market is here, more on Amazon is here, and more from us on the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on international book publishing is here

About the Author

Richard Charkin

Richard Charkin is a former president of the IPA and the UK PA and for 11 years was executive director of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. He has held many senior posts at major publishing houses, including Macmillan, Oxford University Press, Current Science Group, and Reed Elsevier. He is president of The Book Society, vice-chair of Bloomsbury China’s Beijing joint venture with China Youth Press, and a member of the International Advisory Board of the Frankfurt Book Fair. He is a non-executive director of Bonnier Books UK, Liverpool University Press, Institute of Physics Publishing, and Cricket Properties as well as founding his own business, Mensch Publishing. He lectures on the publishing courses at London College of Communications, City University, and University College London. Richard has an MA in Natural Sciences from Trinity College, Cambridge; was a Supernumerary Fellow of Green College, Oxford; attended the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School; and is a visiting professor at the University of the Arts London.


  1. “Audible, Abe Books, Kindle Direct Publishing, and the rest for everything you and your team have done …” Didn’t they just buy these companies, thereby eliminating leading competition?

    1. Complementary businesses, not directly competitive. They need competition if only to keep the competition authorities from closing them down or breaking them up.

  2. This article was a waste of space. Going from admiration to disapproval really only served the writer’s ego more than anything else. Amazon needs to be held accountable for what they have done to the publishing world, and more specifically to indie authors, which I do admit would not be as strong if it wasn’t for Amazon’s desire to make more money from authors and their books.

    During a time such as this and the soon to be financial difficulties that are ahead of us, instead of Amazon stepping up and supporting the wide range of nonprofits that support authors, they could in fact give back to the authors with huge dollar benefits to show their support for them. Instead, they enjoy the benefits of the COVID19 pandemic by increasing their profits on the backs of every author listed in their store.

    While may wish to help the bookstores to earn more money, the program actually helps give authors more money in their pockets then Amazon or any bookstore does. This is where the future of the publishing world is. Sharing the wealth with those that actually create the products…AUTHORS!

    Until Amazon finally opens up their books to be fully scrutinized and we see the true damage they have cost authors, we can not in good faith praise them for the job well done for the publishing world. Greed is a wonderful thing, and Amazon started to create their empire on the backs of authors and continues to do so.

    I try to support local as much as possible even if it cost me a bit more. People deserve to live full lives by earning their fair share!

    1. Una interesante reflexión que comparto en prácticamente su totalidad. Saludos

  3. I am a thousand percent in favor with your piece, Mr. Charkin. I’ve said that Amazon has done incredible things on behalf of authors everywhere for years, but everyone wants to get on the Bash Bezos wagon. Amazon saved everyone’s shirts during Covid and it gave thousands of authors and millions of books a space to come to life. Thanks for being a voice of incredible crystal clarity. Long overdue.

    1. I understand your thought process, but with all the good, Amazon, has made it very difficult for authors to actually make a living from selling their books. 99% of the authors on their site lose money selling books on the site. So is that really something good? Yes, more authors, including myself have benefited from the POD system that was not created by Amazon but embarrassed by Amazon in order for them to be able to sell as many books as they do. My point to the author of the article, and to EVERY author, is to take off the blinders and see the true impact that Amazon is causing the publishing world. You will be surprised at the damage they are continuously causing many markets, not just the publishing world.

  4. While Amazon takes a cut in every book sold (like most service providers do), it has greatly impacted the way publishing works and made publishing accessible to writers who didn’t have the time or the resources to chase down editors and literary agents.

Leave a Comment