US Book Sales for Half of 2017: Looking Good, So Far

In News by Porter Anderson1 Comment

Showing upticks for both adults and children’s/YA book sectors, US book sales look good for the first half of 2017–if adjustments don’t change things.

Image – IStockphoto: Raw Pixel

By Porter Anderson, Editor-in-Chief | @Porter_Anderson

Books for Adults in the Lead
While numbers supposedly don’t lie, they can be read several ways and an interesting note of caution has been raised in association with the Association of American Publishers‘ (AAP) newly released US “StatShot” book sales figures for the first half of 2017.

On the face of it, the news is good. What’s being compared here are sales figures for the first six months of 2017 against the numbers for the same six months of 2016.

The top-line announcement, quoting the association’s material for the press: “Publishers’ revenues (sales to bookstores, wholesalers, direct-to-consumer, online retailers, etc.) were $5.72 billion—up by $195.9 million (3.5 percent) for the first half of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.”

Books for adults were the leading sector, print being the leading format. Trade book sales overall show a 3-percent increase. The association’s CEO, Maria A. Pallante said in a prepared statement: “What a testament to the importance of the publishing industry. Whatever the category, format or distribution platform, books remain a constant in the marketplace and in our lives.”

The association also offers this useful breakdown in its media release, by categories and by formats. Of note, of course, is another statistical high-five for downloaded audio, a positive bump of 32 percent.

By Category: In the first half of 2017, compared to the first half of 2016, trade sales were $3.27 billionup by $95.8 million (3.0 percent)

  • Adult Books had $2.22 billion in sales, up $66.7 million (3.1 percent)
  • Childrens/YA Books had $852.4 million in sales, up $36.8 million (4.5 percent)
  • Religious Presses had $197.0 million in sales, down by $7.7 million (-3.8 percent)

By Format: In the first half of 2017 vs. 2016

  • Paperback/Mass Market books had $1.27 billion in sales, down $23.6 million (-1.8 percent)
  • Hardback books had $1.11 billion in sales, up $98.7 million (9.7 percent)
  • eBooks had $555.7 million in sales, down $26.8 million (-4.6 percent)
  • Downloaded audio had $157.7 million in sales, up $38.2 million (32.0 percent)
  • Other formats (including board books, physical audio) had $181.8 million in sales, up $9.4 million (5.4 percent)

These StatShot figures come from sales that just over 1,200 publishers provide to the association.

Potential Adjustments Ahead

The potentially controversial element is raised by Michael Cader in his coverage at Publishers Lunch. While quick to say that it’s not the association’s fault, he writes that the frequent revisions of monthly book sales numbers we see in these statistics can change initially described outcomes.

Pointing out that “the numbers have improved, no matter what,” it’s the amount of change that may adjust over time.

Here’s Cader’s helpful explanation about his qualms:

“A year ago, AAP data showed net trade sales of $2.803 billion for the first half of the year, down $55.8 million (or -2 percent). That made sense, since it was in line with reports from publicly-held publishers.

“But now, a year later, the final data for the first half of 2016 has changed dramatically: Net trade sales are said to have been $2.974 billion, $171 million higher than first reported.

“By that count, last year’s sales were up $115 million at the midway point—a 4-percent gain—rather than down $56 million.

“The revised data has adult sales $44 million higher than previously reported, with children’s and YA sales a big $128 million higher.”

And because these adjustments aren’t highlighted in reports, Cader notes, they might be hard to discern.

All of which means that the news of the first six months of 2017 looks good, indeed, and we can all hope it stays that way. But considering it as provisional makes sense in case the reporting process produces any negative revisions.

About the Author

Porter Anderson

Facebook Twitter Google+

Porter Anderson is Editor-in-Chief of Publishing Perspectives. Prior to that he was Associate Editor for The FutureBook, a channel at The Bookseller focused on digital publishing. Anderson has also worked with CNN International,, CNN USA, the Village Voice, the Dallas Times Herald, and other media.


  1. Writing—linear thought—is what got us out of the caves and onto the surface of the moon. Sagan took a moment in his Cosmos reverie to limn the prospects for publishing: “What an astonishing thing a book is…across the millennia, an author is speaking clearly and silently inside your head, directly to you…Writing is perhaps the greatest of human inventions…Books break the shackles of time. A book is proof that humans are capable of working magic.” From Homer to Hugo to Harry Potter, from De rerum natura to The Joy of Sex, every form of fun and knowledge has been plunked, pickled and preserved into books…

    Let’s say Sagan is right: Books are pure fun and knowledge. Doesn’t that imply a vastly different market than the one presently perceived? If books supply fun and knowledge, then isn’t the market for books equal in size and scope to society’s appetite for fun and knowledge? Isn’t human nature’s desire for fun and knowledge pretty much limitless?

    How could $14 billion-a-years’ worth possibly be doing the trick? How could $14 billion-a-years’ worth be enough for a product line that slakes a limitless thirst in human society?

    AAP: “What a testament to the importance of the publishing industry…”


    PepsiCo’s Frito-Lay North America Division does more than that in chips alone.

    The APPA (American Pet Products Assoc.) tells us that the American appetite for pet food is $28.23 billion a year; pet supplies and over-the-counter medicine, $14.71 billion; veterinarians, $15.95 billion.

    AAP says, “In the first half of 2017, compared to the first half of 2016, trade sales were $3.27 billion.” The APPA says pet groomers took in nearly that much last year ($5.76 billion).

    Is it really possible that the marketplace has no more room for authors and editors and publishers than for veterinarians and doggie groomers and chewy-toy makers? If Sagan’s right, shouldn’t a prime fount of fun and knowledge do at least as well as Fritos and Friskies?

    Maybe a wider perspective on publishing’s promise in society might be helpful to widening publishing’s path in the marketplace.

Leave a Reply to Peter Cook Cancel reply