By Edward Nawotka
In today’s feature story Rebecca Carter outlines the reasons she is transitioning from being an editor to a literary agent. She says, in part, that her primary motivation is to enable her to continue working to shape the text of a book, rather than, presumably, focusing on ancillary matters, such as sales, marketing and production.
It has become a cliché in the book business that “editors no longer edit” and have become a kind of hybrid literary middleman/guru/sales executive — a role which is, mind you, essential to the publication of the book. André Schiffrin has gone so far to derisively suggest they’ve been reduced to little more than bankers.
So who really does have more influence over the final text of the book — the agent, who initially shapes it for sale to the publishing house, or the editor, who ultimately shapes it for sale to the public?
Is the belief that “editors no longer edit” overstated? Or is the expectation that now that editors have other obligations that take priority, the traditional editorial function (advising on line edits, plot progression, characterization) falls to the agent.
Authors, editors, agents — please share your experiences and observations in the comments below.