As 2009 comes to a close we wanted to celebrate by bringing you a week’s worth of your favorite articles that we’ve run on Publishing Perspectives. We’ll be back on Monday, January 4, with our next new feature. In the meantime, enjoy the best of ‘09 and check our news blog for updates and analysis.
Today, Andy Hunter, editor-in-chief of Electric Literature, argues that the economic and other challenges faced by traditional, conglomerate publishers have opened the door for independent publishers to win new readers.
Editorial by Andy Hunter
In these stormy times, large publishers are jettisoning everything they can in order to lighten their sinking ships. What are they tossing overboard? Among other things, promising authors who haven’t found an audience, as well as anything too literary, difficult, or narrow in appeal. As Random House clings to the desperately inflated Dan Brown, hoping a 5 million print-run and gargantuan promotional budget will keep its head above the waves, what becomes of the cast-offs? Might some happy-go-lucky independents haul a few brilliant writers into their skiffs? And what steps can independents take to ensure they are able to support the new writers and roles they’ll be taking on?
As Ursula K. Le Guin recently pointed out in Harpers magazine, publishing wasn’t always about profits, and isn’t capable of providing the fiscal growth that anxious shareholders require. Private independents, with their low overhead, small staffs, and narrower missions, are better suited to thrive in an age where profits are smaller, audiences are fragmented, and low-fi marketing can go viral. They can afford to experiment with affordable ebook pricing, iPhone applications, electronic subscriptions, and DRM-free formats. They can directly reach readers through email, blogs, and social networking tools.
Promotionally, the Internet is like the Wild West: boundless, lawless, and full of opportunity for the inventive, the hungry, and the risk takers. Unfortunately, “hungry” and “risk-taker” are not adjectives typically associated with an industry whose end product is best consumed by a reader curled up beside the fire. Books are sedate; they go well with tea. Like knitting.
Yet knitters are actually thriving online, thanks to the platform, advocacy, and community provided by innovator Etsy.com. Good stories, like mittens, will always be welcome in a decent home. The question is, can independent publishers get them there?
Etsy has taken handicrafts out of the flea market and into the global market. In doing so, they have exponentially increased the number of customers for craft. By uniting small independent producers, giving them online tools, sponsoring physical and virtual events, emphasizing community above competition, and vastly increasing their exposure, Etsy has been a catalyst for the blooming of craft culture. As in the local farms movement, when awareness is raised and barriers are removed, many customers will eschew the corporate for the individual.
With the right platform, ambition, programs, and marketing, the independent press can fill the vacuum left by the major publishers. Like craft, independent publishing has a great history and tradition. Also like craft, it is typically supported by a small group of informed consumers. Raising awareness, increasing exposure, and creating or leveraging online platforms can inform millions more. Rather than compete for a small group of educated book buyers, independents need to make a coordinated effort to increase the size of the independent publishing market, working together to advocate for the manifold virtues of independent publishing: quality, diversity, and personality.
The crisis in publishing creates an opening, an opportunity for independents to take the middle — the creative space between the avant-garde and the blockbuster — but it will require both virtual and physical activism.
We at the new literary journal Electric Literature have stood in Union Square in New York City in orange tee shirts asking passersby if they read fiction. It is as humbling as it sounds. At our pop-up independent bookstore at the Brooklyn Flea, we sell books and meet readers, building awareness and loyalty. Our goal is for people to think of local indies as “their” presses. You can know an independent in a way you never can a large corporation, no matter how strenuous their marketing efforts.
Still, flea markets and street teams will not ensure a golden future for the independent press. An online platform needs to emerge, something that is to readers, writers and publishers what MySpace is to musicians and Etsy is to craftspeople. Hundreds of thousands of self-published books sit online, but good luck finding the ones worth reading among the virtual stacks at Amazon and the iTunes Store. What new venue emerges, and who creates it, remains to be seen. But the keys to the kingdom are not in Amazon’s hands, nor are they in Apple’s, or Google’s. They are in ours.
Communications technology is democratizing. It provides tools that empower individuals and disrupt top-down control. Decentralization, in turn, fuels creativity. The information age will not, in the long-run, be bad for literature, despite the pain that many are currently feeling. Since major record labels lost their stranglehold on the market, music has thrived — fewer bands become millionaires, but far more are heard. In television, the proliferation of channels and fragmentation of audiences has allowed smaller programs to find avid niches. In each case, democratizing technology — despite the ever-present cries of doom by established interests — results in a creativity boom. Most importantly, deconsolidation allows an audience once treated as monolithic to reveal its true diversity.
As information proliferates, people need trusted filters, which — from the slushpile to the bookshelf — is a role publishers have always played. Independent presses must foster reputations as curators, with strong identities that readers relate to.
Everything paved over eventually cracks, sprouts weeds, and is overrun. The acquisition and corporatization of publishers was a paving over. Now that the pavers are out of funds, we can see the cracks emerging. Years from now, publishing will be a wild, sprouting, resurgent landscape.
No matter how information changes, or how wildly it flows through new and obscure channels, a person — with a soul, or a neurological simulation thereof — sits at its beginning and end. It is this fact that keeps the world from sinking into the doomsday scenarios so often floated in the popular consciousness. When music became too terrible to bear, punk broke. When Walmart and Target started filling our homes, closets and cupboards, people returned to local farms and crafts. With each trend that threatens to rob us of our culture, a counter-trend emerges that fosters it. So begins the heyday of independent publishing.
Andy Hunter is the Co-Publisher and Editor-in-Chief of Electric Literature, a new bi-monthly literary journal.
CONTACT: Andy Hunter directly
Eva Ulian
7 months ago
Renewal and revival in the world of publishing has long been overdue. This article leads the way.
Florrie Kichler
7 months ago
Bravo, Andy, for stating so eloquently what the Independent Book Publishers Association (IBPA) has been saying for 25 years and for what our more than 3000 members already know–indies are the keepers of the culture.
Florrie Binford Kichler, President, IBPA
Kevin Smokler
7 months ago
Andy,
Well said and bravo.
Let me throw one complication into the mix to get your reaction. My thinking is that the future of independent publishing, from a reader’s POV, will depend on two things: 1) Growing the audience and 2) Raising awareness of independent publishing efforts among those who already read avidly. I am of the second camp.
In this second camp, sadly, I think the number of readers that are actively dissatisfied which what large commercial publishing is offering is smaller than you think. On the contrary, I have enough great unread novels at home to keep me a fat and happy reader for the rest of my life and the overwhelming majority of them are published by large houses. Practically speaking, I don’t need another fiction recommendation for as long as I live.
Now I would happily make room for smaller independent efforts if I had some assurance, however slight, that
1) I would not be wasting my too scarce reading time.
and
2) I could sample these efforts in small, short numbers so that if they stank it wouldn’t much matter.
Music and film can be sampled in 3 minutes. Visual art in 10 seconds. Fiction has a real disadvantage of having a heavy built in time commitment.
Therefore, might it be fair to say that whatever platform we develop in the future must also include
1) A sample size small enough so that one can snack on fiction the way one can on music?
and
2) A social component so that recommendations can come from my trusted friends rather than an editor I’ve never met and/or a publication I don’t yet trust?
Keep up the great work.
Kevin Smokler
CEO
BookTour.com
Jon R Horton
7 months ago
I first published a Christmas book with Lightning Source ten years ago and have suffered the slander of ‘Vanity Press’ and all the rest of the nastiness associated with POD over that time. It is nice to know that the situation is maturing and people like myself may have a future, finally.
JesusAngelGarcia
7 months ago
Re: Mr. Smokler’s post — I think the way of the future-now is multimedia: literary-audio-visual mashup.
At least that’s the vision for my 3xbad novel: a “project” (inter/active, multitentacled, ever-evolving “performance,” let’s say) more than a “book” (traditionally static).
In its final form: expansive at worst, global & collaborative at best.
Still looking for an indie-publishing partner, but prospects are good & big plans in the works.
Suggestions, anyone?
J. M. Strother
7 months ago
I like this article. It gives me hope for the future of publishing. I really think the key to success for independent/small press is the establishment of trusted filters that help reduce the risk (both in time and money) for readers to take a chance on unknown/new authors. I agree with Mr. Smokler that methods of sampling are needed so that readers can approach a book sale with confidence.
~jon
Writers Overboard! « File 770
7 months ago
[...] Hunter takes arms against a sea of troubles besetting the publishing industry [...]
Amy Allgeyer Cook
6 months ago
I loved this article. As the founder of Inde-Debut 2010 (a marketing group for authors whose books come from independent presses nation-wide) I am excited to see space opening in the market for small publishers.
I also loved Mr. Smokler’s comment and I wonder if the trend of posting sample chapters on book and reading blogs, as well as author websites, will create the ’sampler platter’ of which he speaks.
Kevin Smokler
6 months ago
Ms. Cook,
Thank you for the kind words. Posted samples exist in goodly numbers already but I fear that unless they are delivered directly to the reader, in the format and on the platform of their choice, and with some social recommendation system built in (a sample by an unknown author from a publisher or journal I don’t know simply doesn’t interest me. I have enough good stuff already.), is beyond the patience of many fat and happy readers, including me.
These aren’t easy fixes to the existing system, to be sure but there is much precedent for them in the music world already. SO let’s get to it. Assignment #1. I’d like prestigious literary journals (including Electric Lit) to start sending out short (like 1 page), awesome pieces of fiction, for free across multiple formats, to tease upcoming issues.
Anja Binninger
6 months ago
This is a very interesting article! Thank you for giving me an insight in the activities and future prospects of independent publishing.
Good to see of how independent publishers see their customers.
Kevin Smokler
6 months ago
As per my complaint above, Narrative Magazine is doing just this via an iphone app.
http://www.narrativemagazine.com/iStory