« Discussion

Do American Universities Favor “Beach Reads” Overs Classics?

Poor Shakespeare, who is apparently too "inaccessible" to the modern American college student.

Poor Shakespeare, who is apparently too “inaccessible” to the modern American college student.

By Dennis Abrams

According to the lead author of a report from the National Association of Scholars (NAS) entitled “Beach Books: What Do Colleges and Universities Want Students to Read Outside Class?,” “US colleges increasingly view anything published before 1990 as ‘inaccessible’ for students.”

Writing about the report in The Guardian, Ashley Thorne notes:

“One summer when I was an undergrad, my college assigned “The Pilgrim’s Progress” to all the students. It was, so to speak, a mandatory beach book, not for credit in any course, but meant to be the basis for a campus-wide discussion on the theme of “difficulty”. Reading Bunyan’s 1678 allegory of Christian’s hike to the Celestial City was indeed an uphill challenge for us. That college assignment comes to mind as I’ve recently been looking at trends in similar summer assignments for college students.
Before they arrive on campus this fall, many American college freshmen will already have finished their first assignment. Their colleges have given them a “common reading”, one book that they are all expected to read. Last year, 309 colleges made such assignments. It’s a great tradition, but something curious has happened since my days as a college student. Only eight schools assigned anything published before 1990, and only four assigned books that could by any stretch be considered classics.
For American college students, 1990 appears to be a historical cliff beyond which it is rumored some books were once written, though no one is quite sure what.”

The eight pre-1990 books that were assigned and the colleges that assigned them?

  • Antigone and King Lear, The King’s College
  • Frankenstein, Fairmont State University
  • Bartleby the Scrivener, Le Moyne College
  • An Enemy of the People, Goucher College
  • A Canticle for Leibowitz, Belmont Abbey College
  • The Life Before Us, Cornell University
  • To Engineer is Human, University of Virginia (School of Engineering and Applied Science)
  • In the Time of the Butterflies, Queens University of Charlotte

As the report’s summary states:

  • 97% of colleges and universities chose books published in 1990 or later.
  • The most popular book by far was The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.
  • Politically-themed books abounded.
  • Very few of the colleges with common reading programs chose classics. The top two subject categories were Science and Multiculturalism/Immigration/Racism, and the top genres were memoir and biography. Some book types were notably missing from common reading assignments. Classic texts and books published before 1990 were scarce, and fiction was far outpaced by nonfiction. There were no classics of history; no biographies of, nor autobiographies, speeches, or writings by, American political leaders; no works by ancient philosophers; no works of the Enlightenment, no classical works of Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or Confucian thought, and no scientific classics.

So, what the most assigned titles from 1990 or later? The answer, in order of most assigned is:

  • The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks 
  • The Other Wes Moore: One Name, Two Fates
  • Outcasts United: A Refugee Team, an American Town 
  • Little Princes: One Man’s Promise to Bring Home the Lost Children of Nepal 
  • Wine to Water: A Bartender’s Quest to Bring Clean Water to the World 
  • Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide 
  • Never Let Me Go 
  • The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind: Creating Currents of Electricity and Hope 
  • The Ghost Map: The Story of London’s Most Terrifying Epidemic—and How It Changed Science, Cities, and the Modern World 
  • The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America’s Great Migration
  • Where Am I Wearing?: A Global Tour to the Countries, Factories, and People that Make Our Clothes
  • Zeitoun

So the question for Thorne then is this: “Why have US colleges decided that the best way to introduce their students to higher learning is through comic books, lite lit, and memoirs?” (Of course, many, many people will object to that characterization of aforementioned titles — as well as the term “beach read” — as being overly patronizing, including ourselves here at Publishing Perspectives.)

And part of her answer is this: “The faculty and administrators who devise these programs seem to think that unless the living author can stroll into the classroom and explain what she had for breakfast this morning, the students will be unable to “relate” to her written words.”

Thorne believes that the choice of book comes down to the ability of the author to visit and speak at the campus (usually for a high fee), trendy topics, as well as “the idea that students are ready for only the most tender shoots. Defenders of the choices say they want ‘accessibility’ and ‘relevance.’ Mark Twain, Charles Dickens, and even Zora Neale Hurston just don’t make the cut when it comes to relevant social issues. In response to critics, some of the colleges say that the books they pick are likely to be the “classics of the future”, but the turnover among the choices from year to year suggests either that we are due for an unprecedented avalanche of new classics or that most of these hunches are off the mark.”

As the authors of the study lament:

“Reading for pleasure continues to decline among young people and college graduates, and it is possible that one reason for this is that colleges are failing to instill in students a love of books. As the study To Read or Not to Read (PDF) [shows], there is a correlation between lack of reading and diminished likelihood for career success, physical activity, and civic participation.

Not only to college students lack shared intellectual experiences with each other, now Americans as a whole lack shared intellectual experiences, ‘These collective moments that we used to have, that Americans did as a culture – nowadays, those things don’t exist,’ said Don Troop, who for seven years published ‘What They’re Reading on College Campuses,’ a column in the Chronicle of Higher Education.

Common reading programs are a thin and fraying thread to a collegiate past in which students in the ordinary course of their education, both in high school and in college, absorbed a substantial body of shared texts. Faculty members a few generations ago could assume without a moment’s doubt that every freshman would have easy familiarity with Julius Caesar, Leaves of Grass, Moby-Dick, The Odyssey, the Declaration of Independence, Genesis, and many others once considered essential. That level of common literary and intellectual experience is gone. Some students today reach college having read such books, but many have not. The baseline of common intellectual experience has been erased and colleges have to cope with the results. The advent of the Common Core State Standards in K-12 education may create a new baseline, but those standards emphasize ‘informational texts’ and have a limited place for literature. If a new baseline emerges, it will still leave college students with a thin level of common intellectual and especially humanistic experience.”

 

This entry was posted in Discussion and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

2 Comments

  1. Posted August 28, 2013 at 6:40 am | Permalink

    This makes me incredibly sad, and frankly, fearful.

  2. Posted August 29, 2013 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    I went to high school and college in the 1970s and middle school for two years previous. I attended a conventional urban school system including the last two years at an alternative high school which was experimental at the time. I attended a media communications oriented college with a liberal multi-disciplinary approach which I opted out of unlike most students (I had already done alternatives) and a more conventional college as an English major when I probably should have been majoring in Art History and Design. I learned my mythology from art history. All that background to say–What I read was a different set of readings than my siblings before me and most of my peers. I did read more contemporary lit in HS and it would be said to be relatable to a multi-cultural audience–but good writing is good writing. I do not regret reading–I often regretted having a different frame of reference but now feel it is regrettable that more folks did not read some of these books. We still read Shakespeare and Dickens and other titles but I do have gaps. A joke with a family member–Don’t tell anyone you have never read or seen Hamlet. One summer while in college I set out to read the 2 volume set of Shakespeare on the shelf in our home–Titus Andronicus was first–I was worn out by the time I was done! I notice on Jeopardy that younger folks are less well read regarding literature and it seems their news knowledge is likely self selected and less broad also. I do think we need a good survey of literature but good thought provoking books should not be overlooked because they are not classic. Perhaps we need to do a better job of explaining why something becomes a classic and how these themes have been carried forward through time and are still relatable today. Anyway–just my two cents.

  • SIGN UP NOW!
    Enter your email address below to receive daily news updates from Publishing Perspectives.
    Click here to learn more about our newsletters
  • Monetize Your Backlist

    Organized by Publishing Perspectives

    Hear experts from publishing and technology discuss strategies and tools you can use to generate more revenue from your backlist content.

    What: Monetizing the Backlist event
    When: 9am–1pm on April 24, 2014
    Where: Scholastic Headquarters, NYC

    Buy your tickets now!