Table of Contents
- “Seems Inevitable…Big Publishers’ Power Is Reduced”
- Why the Silence of the Grands?
- Financing Fan Fiction
- Those “Toxic” eBook Royalties
- Author Services, Not Disservices
- No Money in It?
- Last Gas: Paris in the Machine
It’s hard for a publishing giant to catch a break these days.
Mike Shatzkin, longtime senior-statesman consultant to the industry! the industry! is answering reader Jack W. Perry there in a comment on Shatzkin’s article, Anybody Press is the new member of the Big Six (for ebooks, at least).
The others [the major publishing houses] have a lot of capabilities, but they’re in a race against time to develop additional distribution among them to match what PRH will be able to create or, alternatively, to change what they are from a general trade publisher to a multi-niche publisher with *strong* community capabilities that can be leveraged for other business models.
Yup. My songsshowsbooksmessagesfriends are alllllll over the place too. http://t.co/NJro7VZVdw
— rick joyce (@rickjoyce) June 23, 2013
Feel like catching your digitally disrupted breath this week? Yeah, me, too. Shatzkin is giving us just the thing. This is the kind of walk through the park that gives you a little perspective. The Frisbees are in other hands and dogs’ mouths. We’re watching. One concept he offers: “indie entities.” He writes that those entities:
…are more likely to be disruptive on a larger scale than indie authors have been so far. So we might have Any Organization Press growing even faster in the next few years than Anybody Press has for the past few.
“Anybody Press” and “Any Organization Press” are Shatzkin’s aggregations of the rising force of entrepreneurial publishing.
Anybody Press is almost certainly growing faster in ebook sales than any of the other Big Six.
He’s responding to the reports issued earlier this month from Bowker, indicating that some 12 percent of ebooks may be self-published. As we’ve long pointed out in Ether-eal moments together, such estimations, despite the best efforts and capability of Bowker’s research folks, are highly suspect.
One of the perils of working from home is that sudden wildlife can render you into inexplicable silence during a phone call. — ljndawson (@ljndawson) June 24, 2013
Many self-publishing authors and “entities” aren’t registering their output with the ISBNs Bowker sells and uses to track active titles directly. And major retailers of ebooks, including Amazon, aren’t reporting numbers to us, they’re holding such figures close to the chest as proprietary data. This is their right, by the way, no question. It just has the unfortunate side effect of meaning that we don’t have an accurate picture of how large the ebook universe is, nor of how much of it is self-published.
So if 12 percent sounds low to you, you’ll find company among some of your colleagues. Nor is a better guess readily available. This is, actually, a very serious problem, in that without the full spectrum of numbers from some of the very biggest retail players, we really don’t know what we’re talking about when we try to quantify the impact of self-publishing on the business. Nevertheless, Shatzkin soldiers on, these best-latest-proposed-figures in hand, to sketch out several useful elements of the self-publishing landscape as we can glimpse it from one high point to the next.
For example, he notes:
The self-publishing or Amazon-publishing route still requires pretty much giving up on bookstore or other retail distribution.
When traditional-to-self-publishing author Barry Eisler turned that around and suggested that retail distribution is big publishing’s best, last power, he almost had his head handed to him, as you might recall from the Pikes Peak incident.
He was trounced by suggesting this in a keynote address at a writers’ conference. Shatzkin, reading the self-published handwriting scrawled on the outer walls of some major houses, is watching the digital-to-traditional balance of sales shift—and yes, all roads lead him to roam the endless shelves of cyberspace for best potential. Here he is, emphasis mine:
If I were the business development manager for Anybody Press (and, on some consulting projects we are working on, I am) I would see lots of target markets for growth. I’d encourage…doing the calculation of what the sales times royalty rate is for the “bought online” portion of the market versus what the sales times royalty rate is for a conventional deal that gets you the “whole” market. As the “bought online” share grows, more and more genres and authors will find that giving up the retail sale in favor of a bigger share of the revenue per sale online is to their financial benefit.
Mind you, it’s a good moment not to run entirely to one side of the room. And yet, change is still coming:
Particularly viewed in a global context and aside from straight narrative books, the print-at-retail component has a long way to go before it becomes irrelevant. But when I say that, I mean “many years,” not “many decades.”
All in all, this is a quieter, more contemplative, and—I mean this as a compliment to our good colleague Mike—a less combative write than we may have seen during the springtime offensives of conferences and trade shows. Less defensive. More watchful. Hell, maybe we’re all just crazy from the heat.
And it’s not as if Shatzkin doesn’t have a confab to sell you now. His and Michael Cader’s Publishers Launch program is working with Digital Book World to produce with consultant Peter McCarthy the September 26 two-track Marketing and Publishing Services cotillion. But even for a longtime roller-with-the-punches like Shatzkin, these are new punches incoming, and I like seeing the footwork slow down every now and then to try to suss out the dynamics before going to the mat for one strategy or another. As Shatzkin puts it:
What people spend for books won’t necessarily shrink drastically, but where the money goes will shift drastically. The challenge for today’s leading revenue producers will be to find the ways their business models can adapt to the shift.
And in answering that original constant commenter, Robert Gottlieb, Shatzkin brings it into the sharpest focus yet. Note that “early days” caution. But pay attention to what “seems inevitable”:
I think it is early days from which to draw any broad conclusions, but it seems inevitable to me that the big publishers’ power is reduced as the parts that nobody else can do (putting books on shelves) become less important compared to the parts that others with much less scale can do (delivering ebooks to the marketplace).
Fotos: The Solstice and the Supermoon http://t.co/7j28SsDSfZ
— Ian Huckabee (@ianhuckabee) June 24, 2013
Just a note before we go on, in reflection of the ideas Mike Shatzkin has put forward here.
Over the weekend, I enjoyed a great discussion with some readers of Writer Unboxed, on the topic of royalty issues around ebooks. And I found myself in one response echoing what I’d said to Len Edgerly in his Kindle Chronicles podcast: I really regret the relative silence of leadership in the major publishing establishment. It’s bad enough that we all look to the Big Six-becoming-Five as “Old Publishing.” Even with the PRH merger coming in, two oldsters don’t make a new. But this is tradition, of course, and not to be dismissed lightly. A concept of what is dignified, proper, appropriate has been in place for a long time. It’s far easier for the Bermuda-shorted entrepreneurial class to yak its business all day and night than it is for those who were trained to the pinstripe and have corporate overlords who don’t want to hear their business passed around on the street. Having come from deep inside a news industry that once instructed us to “set the agenda” for the population—gatekeeping at its finest—I know how hard it is to let go of the concepts of propriety and decorum.
But as a whole, the business in recent years has been poorer, I think, for the fact that the new, more experimental, reachier elements empowered by the digital dynamic have had the luxury of talking (and talking and talking and talking) and the older guard has not. Unless a session is convened by Judge Denise Cote—who many of us probably see as an honorary member of the publishing community by now—we hear precious little from the main players.
Sure, there’s a word here or there at conferences, guarded comments on congenial panels; a carefully sanitized statement to authors or agents might arrive from one tower or another from time to time. But for the most part…silence
So I’m especially grateful for a recent bit of commentary from Molly Barton, Penguin’s Global Digital Director and an architect of the Book Country read-review-and-publish community. In New York Isn’t Book Country Anymore at the Huffington Post, Barton writes from a personal perspective of her 11 years’ experience, first in a highly centralized Brooklyn-and-Manhattan business that today, of course, is no longer sensibly defined by geography.
I edited a number of women writers who were not born or raised in Manhattan or Brooklyn, and I wrestled with how to build more inclusive, collaborative ways for writers to begin their careers. I began to think about all the writers in other places who didn’t have access to other writers (never mind agents or editors), or to the critical feedback they needed to improve their book. Who could share war stories with them, and help them learn all they need to know about the craft and the business of writing.
Eventually, of course, a lot of the problems of author isolation have been solved by the many booming social media (still a plural word, damn it) that now create so much inter-connectivity and distraction in the publishing community that nobody can get any work done. Maybe we should go back to having everything centered in New York. Just kidding. (I think.)
Stonehenge permanent road closure work to begin http://t.co/cHkt5ck9OS archaeology England
— Ticia Verveer (@ticiaverveer) June 24, 2013
But, seriously, the chance to have a major house’s executive’s commentary mixed in with the crowd-roar of the mighty marching self-publishing platoons is too good, let’s take note of it. Some will say that Barton is pushing Book Country, of course. And it’s certainly true that as Barton winds into her recitative—”I Set Out To Build a Platform Called Book Country”—we’re reminded of the many times we’ve read what seemed like a wholly informative blog post from an author only to find the other shoe dropping: “So that’s why I wrote this how-to book, to help you with your writing,” etc., you know the drill.
Until ebook sales are transparent we cannot move forward as an industry. #liberatEbooks
— jonny geller (@jonnygeller) June 19, 2013
Having spent some time talking with Barton, though, I believe her to be a genuinely thoughtful and motivated soul with that most important of characteristics we’re probably missing from so many silent, tailored suits: a sense of humor. And you know what? From an executive in one of the two merging biggies—surely the most ominously quiet Penguin in creation—this isn’t half bad:
I am happy to say that New York no longer has a lock on being “Book Country.” Your desk, your laptop, your tablet, is book country.
Thanks for contributing to the conversation, Molly.
Back to Table of Contents
I realised that Amazon Worlds is a whole new revenue stream for aspiring writers and established writers, it’s co-opting the edge and making it mainstream and crucially introducing a revenue model that work for everyone.
I love how our colleague Eoin Purcell just gets right out there and tells you he missed a major part of the Amazon Kindle Worlds initiative. His post is headlined Somehow I Missed This Incredibly Important detail of Kindle Worlds: MONEY.
What has called him to have a second look at that late-spring development is the news, of course, that new licensees have been added to the program. Headliner Hugh Howey’s Silo Saga trilogy, Barry Eisler’s John Rain books, Neal Stephenson’s Foreworld Saga, and Blake Crouch’s Wayward Pine series now are fair game for the busy writers of fan fiction through the program.
Perhaps the heaviest hitter of the new additions to the program is Valiant Entertainment, which opens up Bloodshot, X-O Manowar, Archer & Armstrong, Harbinger, and Shadowman to the avid creativity of the fans.
It’s this part of the Kindle Worlds program that seems to have escaped Purcell and now has his admiration. I’m quoting here from Seattle’s press release:
Amazon Publishing will pay royalties to both the rights holders of the Worlds and the author. The standard author’s royalty rate (for works of at least 10,000 words) will be 35% of net revenue. Amazon Publishing will also pilot an experimental new program for particularly short works—between 5,000 and 10,000 words. For these short stories—typically priced under one dollar—Amazon will pay the royalties for the World’s rights holder and pay authors a digital royalty of 20%.
When Purcell read that, he writes: I was struck by how many of those new writers came from or were converts to the world of self-publishing and it reminded me once again how powerful and useful Amazon’s policy of accommodating self-publishers and small publishers has been in their development of a digital publishing platform.
Like Mike Shatzkin in the previous item, you see, Purcell is looking at the ascendant power of the self-publishing movement and how integral this is looking to be to strategies “going forward.” (It’s great, the corporate world’s use of that term, isn’t it? “Going forward.” As if anyone has ever had any success with strategies “going backward.”)
Purcell is outspoken in his regard for the ingenuity of the Amazonian fan-fiction model. I’m going to give him to you at a little length here because his late understanding of how Kindle Worlds works gives us a valuable second chance to review just what’s afoot here. So bear with me and catch these cogent points:
Before I read those words, I thought Amazon Worlds was a clever piece of distraction from Amazon, a way to get more people on the Kindle platform, perhaps a mine for future talent and a stick to beat publishers with….What’s more in this model, because they own the platform and delivery system they still keep a chunk of the revenue. …Think about this new model for a few seconds. Successful writers, who in genre fiction were already pretty supportive of fan-fiction anyway, now have an active reason to support and encourage fan-fiction that is licensed by Amazon. They have a reason to drive people onto the kindle platform because when they see stories based on their worlds and characters, they will profit from them.
Hey, influencers. You know thought leaders are laughing at you behind your backs, right?
— Mark O’Connell (@mrkocnnll) June 24, 2013
This is not Purcell’s only view of the Amazonian approach. On Medium, in Ebooks & The Exclusivity Factor (written before he picked up on the licensing/commercial factors of Kindle Worlds), he writes about Kindle Direct Publishing’s exclusivity arrangement with authors, KDP Select.
From Amazon’s perspective KDP Select is a clever program. It gives the company a chance to see how self-published material performs before anyone else or at least during the period while it is exclusive to Amazon. Such data is surely valuable in determining whether an author might be a profitable acquisition for Amazon Publishing and what genres perform best among readers. Maybe more important than that though is the power of the exclusive content the program generates to drive new readers to the Kindle ecosystem (after all, readers can only buy those titles enrolled in KDP Select from Amazon) or in convincing new members to sign up for Amazon Prime or indeed in convincing existing members of Prime to stay on the package, reducing churn as the industry puts it.
In both pieces, Purcell—himself, a publisher, by the way—is showing you something even more valuable than several elements of Amazon’s successful understanding of consumer appeal. He’s demonstrating a willingness to learn, to study, to sort out why something is working and how it was conceived. Rancor isn’t hindering him from analyzing. Nor is he entirely impressed. His comments at Medium include misgivings about the exclusivity involved in Amazon’s offer:
I think the issue of exclusivity is less attractive than Amazon believes and it is here, I believe that Amazon has misstepped. The offer Amazon makes would be a decent one if Amazon still controlled 80-90% of the ebook market but when you know that Amazon controls less than 60% in some markets and even in the US, its dominance is not what it used to be, allowing the company exclusivity sounds like a recipe for smaller sales and reduced exposure.
Looking especially closely at subscriptions and their potential for Amazon and others, Purcell produces this and his newer piece on Kindle Worlds with respect, clarity, and a calm eye. These posts are well worth your time.
Publishers have put themselves in an interesting position. Ebook sales are rising against paperbacks, and many authors are becoming – encouraged by their editors – their own best advocates in the online setting. On the one hand, such authors may be less willing to carry this weight if they’re not being properly remunerated for digital sales. On the other, those who are most effective in this arena may feel less and less interested in being published by a major house.
Author Nick Harkaway handily has picked up where we left off in that weekend look at ebook royalties I’ve mentioned at Writer Unboxed. In Get Your Geiger Counter Out (ebook royalties are back, and this time they’re toxic), he lays out the authorial view of Old Publishing’s negotiating tone:
The red lines drawn by publishers – we MUST have ebook rights, you WILL accept 25% – start to look both shaky (as they are crossed by writers coming into a publishing deal from a self-publishing success) and demonstrably unfair.
“Those who make a distinction between education and entertainment don’t know anything about either.” – Marshall McLuhan — Dave Morris (@MirabilisDave) June 23, 2013
The author who gets a reasonable advance and whose book sells much better than expected (is) the one who suffers the greatest loss. How can anyone in this industry see that as defensible?
As was pointed out helpfully by DeFiore in WU discussion, the HarperCollins demonstration of ebook profitability for News Corp backers that touched off the debate is “a simplistic look at a complex issue” because it represents one profit scenario devised for investors’ eyes, an example that can be affected and changed by “all kinds of pricing experiments and price points.” This is important, as is DeFiore’s assertion—with my agreement—that a good publisher still has a lot to offer an author in many if not most cases. Nevertheless, the overall e-trend indicated in this academic model is greater profitability for publishers and lesser royalty revenue for authors. In DeFiore’s original example, without fixed costs and many other conditions factored in, he parses the potential this way:
$27.99 hardcover generates $5.67 profit to publisher and $4.20 royalty to author. $14.99 agency priced e-book generates $7.87 profit to publisher and $2.62 royalty to author. So, in other words, at these average price points, every time a hardcover sale is replaced by an e-book sale, the publisher makes $2.20 more per copy and the author makes $1.58 less.
Just unfollowed someone for literally posting the number of times they’ve “checked in” via Foursquare. Mostly because I do not care. — Brett Sandusky (@bsandusky) June 21, 2013
Harkaway gets the hypothetical nature of the example, and its implications, writing:
Let’s assume for a moment that this holds roughly true across the industry. Absent some really powerful, clear, and unhedged explanations, authors are going to be miserable and furious. The question is how they will respond.
I appreciate the personal context in which Harkaway looks at the issue, too. You may find resonance in what he’s saying here:
I’ve been wrestling with a sense of confusion for a little while now. It all seemed to be going so well for the traditional trade, and yet so many of the things I think are important in the digital transition remain completely untouched. I would have expected to see publisher-branded ereading software by now, direct sales and reading clubs, bundled digital and physical copies with deals on audiobooks, loyalty schemes, communities, discovery engines, price experiments, more DRM-free books, a faster transition of manuscripts to books and a partial end to the seasonal nature of the trade, with at least some books coming to market when they’re ready. These things just don’t seem to be on the menu.
And he positions what we must consider to be a serious potential:
If the industry is achieving this happy stasis through a perpetual blood transfusion from its authors, that would explain a lot, but it would also leave open the possibility of a sudden collapse as disenchanted creators demand a better slice of the action or find other ways of doing their thing.
Those last 3 retweets are why I spend so much time on Twitter. Fascinating.
— Damien Walter (@damiengwalter) June 24, 2013
Harkaway is careful here, as DeFiore is, as we all must be. “That sounds a bit over the top, perhaps,” he writes. Indeed, the author corps at this point may not be so organized or unified in its understanding of its potential. A spacious fragmentation still is in place as newcomers to the industry retrace each others’ steps toward publication and replicate both successful and unsuccessful formulas. But in Harkaway’s view, that means the situation needs attention in the present, not the future:
It is now time for that 25% to shift, and shift properly. Taking a bite out of authors is neither a long term answer nor an acceptable one.
Here is one of the most interesting points you’ll encounter this week about author services:
Not all authors want to self-publish, but in order to maximise their chances of getting picked up by an agent, authors who want a traditional deal should make sure that they produce the best quality manuscript they possibly can — the less work an agent or publisher thinks a manuscript needs, the more positively they will view it. For traditional authors, it’s worth considering working with a literary consultancy which focuses on the editorial side of things.
While the good whitefoxers can’t seem to find a capital W on their keyboards (is it really so clever to write your company name all-lowercase? Maybe they just want to be seen as German…), its principals include Peter Collingridge, formerly of just about everything and now with Safari.
Charman-Anderson is getting at an important point in this time of entrepreneurial author development: even the surest-looking walk to a traditional contract now needs to be all but camera-ready. Good author services, especially in the area of developmental edits and copy-editing can be indispensable.
The hunt for Snowden reminds me of the hunt for Leeson. Related – switching from Twitterrific to Tweetbot so I can filter it out. — Benedict Evans (@BenedictEvans) June 24, 2013
But, needless to say, the quality and ethical foundations of author services—let alone the outright author fury encountered in conversations about some vendors such as the Author Solutions companies (now facing an attempted lawsuit)—surrounds every consideration in this field. The mere mention of pricing for editorial services can get you an hour or two of hair-tearing tweets these days.
Charman-Anderson’s Part 2 is a look at “Choosing Who To Work With.” Pack a lunch.
7 common myths you thought were true http://t.co/1GKGbFQLWM
— HuffPost Books (@HuffPostBooks) June 24, 2013
“There’s a whole generation of kids who are really bright and who are interested in this work. None of them have been trained as reporters and it’s disastrous. Reporting is a craft. Like other crafts, you learn it through apprenticeship and by doing the job. You can’t substitute blogging on the Huffington Post for writing long reported pieces for magazines or working your way up from the Quad Cities Times to the Chicago Tribune.”
That’s writer David Samuels quoted by Noah Davis in a revealing, candid essay at the Awl, I Was Paid $12.50 An Hour To Write This Story. At issue is not only the Internet’s “democratization,” which has flooded the industry with unprepared and frequently unpaid workers. There’s also the alarming collapse of pay rates which teeter between the still-questionable models of digital-only publications and what one speaker in the story, Ann Friedman, describes as unwise management of resources in print magazines. She says to Davis:
“I actually think it would be possible for old-school print outlets to pay better if they wouldn’t over-assign or if they didn’t have super-fancy real estate in Midtown. The notion that media is both a struggling industry and a glamour profession is totally ridiculous. If you’re a struggling industry that’s worried about declining advertising revenues, fucking pack up, move to Brooklyn, and stop triple-assigning every issue.”
This is a complex and well nuanced write, worthy of some time in a quiet moment.
I think the least believable thing about Superman as a character is his steady job in print media
— Hayden Wright (@HaydoAtHome) June 23, 2013
If you have a publishing conference in the offing, let me know about it via my contact page, and I’ll be happy to consider including it in my site’s listing and in columns as I have the chance. Here’s a look at conferences coming in the near term. Please note that a listing here is not my endorsement of a conference or other event, but an informational inclusion.
June 27-29 Jackson Hole, Wyoming: Jackson Hole Writers Conference: “Each year distinguished speakers, editors and agents join our resident faculty to deliver a weekend of active and engaging dialogue, collaboration and the opportunity for all of us to raise the stakes on our work.Manuscript critiques are an important part of our conference, providing a way for you to discuss your work one-on-one with experienced writers, editors and agents.” The program also features a pre-conference writing workshop.
June 29 San Francisco: digi.lit: Litquake’s Digital Publishing Conference: “Litquake’s digi.lit is a full-day conference that will explain and demystify the new digital publishing landscape.digi.lit will put you in the same room with authors, publishers, editors, marketers, agents, and booksellers who are defining the future of reading and publishing.” Note speakers include April Eberhardt, Jon Fine, Laura Miller, Neal Pollack, John Tayman.
July 8 London Southbank: The Bookseller Design Conference: “Great design is a collaborative effort. The conference will focus on effective use of design across every element of the book business. We’ll explore ways in which we can all be braver, have more fun and escape the trap of the copycat cover into which we are all forced far too regularly.” List of speakers.
July 9 London Southbank: The Bookseller Marketing & Publicity Conference: “The Bookseller Marketing & Publicity Conference launches as a full-day event (Tuesday 9th July 2013 at the Purcell Room, Southbank Centre), for the first time. The programme will reflect that the lines between publicity and marketing are blurring. The aim of the conference is to provide inspiration and practical tips to drive sales and reader engagement. We’ll be bringing marketing, publicity and brand leaders from outside the industry to give us some time to look up from our books and understand the wider trends.” List of speakers.
July 14-19 New Haven (Greenberg Conference Center): Yale Publishing Course – Leadership Strategies in Magazine & Digital Publishing: “The Yale Publishing Course is designed for mid- to senior-level professionals from all over the world. Our mission is to provide participants with the knowledge and skills that will enable them to be more effective leaders and advance their careers.” List of speakers and topics.
July 21-26 New Haven (Greenberg Conference Center): Yale Publishing Course – Leadership Strategies in Book Publishing: “The program provides a mixture of overviews of the current and future state of the industry and in-depth explorations of specific topics in editorial content, design, marketing, circulation, advertising, finance, and management. The carefully-selected industry experts and distinguished faculty from the Yale School of Management present real-world business models and case studies from both large and small publishers.” List of speakers and topics (including Publishing Perspectives’ Ed Nawotka, Perseus’ Rick Joyce, Sourcebooks’ Dominique Raccah, and Craig Mod).
July 25-28 Seattle: Pacific Northwest Writers Association: “This annual summer conference is an opportunity for writers of all levels to meet other writers, attend sessions focused on different aspects of the craft, and pitch your ideas to agents and editors. Sessions led by industry experts are crafted to address many aspects of the publishing industry. From keeping track of your expenses to crafting the perfect pitch, sessions give you a chance to interact with experts and ask questions in a friendly and open environment.” Speakers include Donald Maass, Debbie Macomber.
September 26 New York City (Metropolitan Pavilion): Marketing + Publishing Services Conference & Expo: “This innovative conference & expo is really two related shows, held together. The Marketing Conference is a full-day dedicated event that presents a comprehensive strategy for marketing in the digital age. ThePublishing Services Expo offers three finely-targeted “mini-conferences” for important and often-overlooked publishing constituencies. Each track is an affordably priced, efficiently programmed two-and-half-hour session that pairs concise educational sessions with vendor speed dating to learn about new solutions.” Produced by Digital Book World and Publishers Launch (Publishers Lunch’s Michael Cader and Mike Shatzkin).
September 27-29 Los Angeles: Writers Digest Conference West: “You’ll make real connections with fellow writers, experience the thrill of pitching your work to literary agents and editors, and get practical publishing-industry advice and writing inspiration from successful authors at Writer’s Digest Conference West.”
October 12 San Francisco: Writing for Change Conference: “The Fifth San Francisco Writing for Change Conference is the place to discover whether your book can change the world. The theme of the conference is “Changing the World One Book at a Time,” and the goal is to encompass business, politics, technology, social issues, the environment, culture, the law, and much more.” The event will be held at the Unitarian Universalist Center at the corner of Geary and Franklin in San Francisco.
November 21, London: The Bookseller FutureBook Conference: Once again at the Queen Elizabeth II Centre in Westminster, the conference is industry-focused and usually includes both plenary and breakout sessions during the course of the day. Details as they become available.
February 13-16, 2014: San Francisco Writers Conference: “Attendees have access to more than fifty “how to” sessions, panels, and workshops. An Independent Editor consultation and Ask a Pro are included in the registration fee. Our famously popular Speed Dating for Agents is still only $50 to pitch to a room full of agents. And you will find there are plenty of one-on-one opportunities to pitch your work to well-known publishing professionals during the weekend. The Conference features large and small traditional publishing houses, but also gives attendees the latest e-publishing, social media, and self-publishing information.”
Lightning hits the Eiffel Tower, Paris. pic.twitter.com/FtvpXkMyUL
— Our Beautiful World (@Globe_Pics) June 24, 2013
When you leave the guide books behind, you experience a place not as a checklist of sites to see, but a continuous flow of the details that define it – architecture, typography, color, doorways.
Is there anything more fulsome and yet more compelling than travel writing? It’s not unlike the potency Noel Coward attributed to “cheap music.”
Still, if you find yourself not in Paris this summer and would like to be—before August when everyone will be not in Paris, of course—The Paris Journal is an app that might interest you. It’s not available for anything but iOS now, of course. Insert the usual Sigh of the Inconvenienced here, my fellow Android-ians. “Coming soon.” Hold your breath.
Combines fine art photography and minimalist video into visual stories of Paris neighborhoods. Each volume covers one neighborhood over the course of one day, from morning to night.
The offering’s product page promises:
It was important to us that the visual narrative was uninterrupted. There are no technological distractions, travel tips or editorial comments – just a tranquil, virtual escape to the city’s streets.
— Sebastian Posth (@sposth) June 23, 2013
Porter Anderson is a Fellow with the National Critics Institute, a 32-year journalist with several newspapers and three networks of CNN, as well as a producer posted to the Rome headquarters of the United Nations’ World Food Programme. This column, Ether for Authors, appears here at Publishing Perspectives on Tuesdays. Anderson’s Writing on the Ether is read on Thursdays at JaneFriedman.com, and he is a regular contributor to WriterUnboxed.com. His all-new London on the Ether for The Bookseller was inaugurated during the London Book Fair. More about him is at PorterAnderson.com.
Main image / iStockphoto: Sculpies