By Edward Nawotka
When you’re in school you’re constantly reminded to proofread your papers before submitting them to your professors. Unfortunately, time crunched students rarely take the time. Who can blame them, with computers and auto-correct promising to catch and fix your mistakes? It’s a bad habit born of convenience.
Sadly, this problem has also taken root in book publishing, where digitization has made publishing at the push of a button possible. The resulting mistakes — whether due to inattention or inaccurate OCR software — have left many readers frustrated with the number of errors that have slipped through.
And it’s not just book publishing that has the problem: the June 5 edition of the Wall Street Journal had a glaring error in the deck of its front page headline, which read “U.S. Adds Just 54,0000 Positions…” A misplaced comma in a financial newspaper?! That has potential for disaster if it was in the context of, say, a stock price.
So tell us, has digitization exacerbated the problem of errors in books? Is it mere carelessness? A combination of both? Or perhaps readers, who demand that books be produced ever faster and sold ever more cheaply, are to blame?
Has Digitization Increased Errors in Books?
- BOTH publishers and computers to blame (51%, 83 Votes)
- NO, it is only the fault of overstretched and/or careless publishers (32%, 52 Votes)
- YES, digitization is largely responsible (10%, 17 Votes)
- NO, it is the fault of readers who demand cheaper and faster books (7%, 10 Votes)
Total Voters: 162