-
-
-
Browse by Subject
agents Amazon Apple authors BookExpo America book fair book marketing book prize book review book sales bookselling Brazil Children's China digital content digital publishing digitization distribution E-books E-readers fiction France Frankfurt Book Fair future of publishing germany Google ipad Kindle literature London Book Fair Middle East Publishing Perspectives reading rights sales self publishing Social Media Spain statistics translation Twitter UK USA video Writing
Related Posts
Reading the Age of Screens, Continued
February 24, 2011
By Hannah Johnson
Publishing Perspectives contributor and publisher of Open Letter Press, Chad W. Post, wrote a piece called “Reading in the Age of Screens” in which he discussed how book discovery works in the digital age. He asked how readers can find the “pattern-breaking” books, the truly revolutionary literature that is unlike anything they’ve read before, in an age when book discovery is based on algorithms that only recognize pattern. Even social networks, Post said, tend to reflect your own tastes (after all, your friends tastes aren’t likely to be too different from your own).
On the Three Percent blog, Post has continued this discussion in several parts. Here is a quick summary, but I’m no Chad Post, so you really should just read the original:
In Part III, he asks a group of students how they find new books (hint: book reviews don’t play a prominent role here). It could be that we all have to rely on serendipity to find the books we didn’t even know we wanted to read.
Part IV observes that even though so many more books are available online for immediate download, there is still a problem of discovery. You can download an obscure book, but how would you know to? The good news is that the Internet also allows direct interaction with customers, which means authors and publishers can help serendipity along.
In Part V, Post observes: “If you’re looking to find the thing to ‘blow your mind,’ you won’t be looking at the New York Times (were you ever?), but to the random blogger-personality who ‘gets’ you.”