<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Posthumously Publishing Unfinished Work Fair to the Author?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publishingperspectives.com/2009/12/bonus-material-is-posthumously-publishing-unfinished-work-fair-to-the-author/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publishingperspectives.com/2009/12/bonus-material-is-posthumously-publishing-unfinished-work-fair-to-the-author/</link>
	<description>International publishing news and opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:46:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Bustillos</title>
		<link>http://publishingperspectives.com/2009/12/bonus-material-is-posthumously-publishing-unfinished-work-fair-to-the-author/comment-page-1/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Bustillos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishingperspectives.com/?p=8770#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>I will be buying The Pale King as soon as it&#039;s available. 

Had the author wished to, he could have destroyed this work; instead, he seems to have meant for it to be published ... he had been famous for long enough to know that there were people interested in reading even a stray shopping list he&#039;d left lying around, so if there&#039;d been anything he didn&#039;t want seen, he would have destroyed it.

Wallace had a polarizing effect on readers when he was alive. I heard him once at a reading describe the letters he received from readers, how some of them would say, &quot;I love your work, it means so much to me,&quot; and others, &quot;what pretentious, meaningless twaddle.&quot; And then he said, &quot;and neither of these groups seems to me to be entirely deluded, or insane.&quot; What happens after you&#039;re done writing can&#039;t ever be controlled, isn&#039;t ever &quot;fair&quot;; or rather, questions of fairness are beside the point, somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be buying The Pale King as soon as it&#8217;s available. </p>
<p>Had the author wished to, he could have destroyed this work; instead, he seems to have meant for it to be published &#8230; he had been famous for long enough to know that there were people interested in reading even a stray shopping list he&#8217;d left lying around, so if there&#8217;d been anything he didn&#8217;t want seen, he would have destroyed it.</p>
<p>Wallace had a polarizing effect on readers when he was alive. I heard him once at a reading describe the letters he received from readers, how some of them would say, &#8220;I love your work, it means so much to me,&#8221; and others, &#8220;what pretentious, meaningless twaddle.&#8221; And then he said, &#8220;and neither of these groups seems to me to be entirely deluded, or insane.&#8221; What happens after you&#8217;re done writing can&#8217;t ever be controlled, isn&#8217;t ever &#8220;fair&#8221;; or rather, questions of fairness are beside the point, somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://publishingperspectives.com/2009/12/bonus-material-is-posthumously-publishing-unfinished-work-fair-to-the-author/comment-page-1/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishingperspectives.com/?p=8770#comment-3174</guid>
		<description>I agree with Erin that the unfinished work can be of great value to readers.  Although the work may not be in the final form the author would have given us, as long as the reader knows that it is an unfinished work, I don&#039;t think that it is unfair to the author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Erin that the unfinished work can be of great value to readers.  Although the work may not be in the final form the author would have given us, as long as the reader knows that it is an unfinished work, I don&#8217;t think that it is unfair to the author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EKSwitaj</title>
		<link>http://publishingperspectives.com/2009/12/bonus-material-is-posthumously-publishing-unfinished-work-fair-to-the-author/comment-page-1/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>EKSwitaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishingperspectives.com/?p=8770#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>Who cares if it&#039;s unfair to authors? They&#039;re dead. They don&#039;t care anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares if it&#8217;s unfair to authors? They&#8217;re dead. They don&#8217;t care anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://publishingperspectives.com/2009/12/bonus-material-is-posthumously-publishing-unfinished-work-fair-to-the-author/comment-page-1/#comment-3169</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishingperspectives.com/?p=8770#comment-3169</guid>
		<description>Whether commercially successful or not, I think it&#039;s always of interest to see the unpublished work of writers to give insight into their talent, their process, and to provide new stories for their fans and supporters.  With DFW and, in light of his tragic death, I think publishing THE PALE KING is even more important.  DFW wrote novels and stories that had great impact on society, literature, and his fans.  To be robbed of his talent so early in his life and career, I think a lot of people need to see where he was in his writing, his mind-set, and find some peace in these last words of his.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether commercially successful or not, I think it&#8217;s always of interest to see the unpublished work of writers to give insight into their talent, their process, and to provide new stories for their fans and supporters.  With DFW and, in light of his tragic death, I think publishing THE PALE KING is even more important.  DFW wrote novels and stories that had great impact on society, literature, and his fans.  To be robbed of his talent so early in his life and career, I think a lot of people need to see where he was in his writing, his mind-set, and find some peace in these last words of his.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: After Six Years, Germany&#8217;s KiWi Cashes In on Infinite Jest &#124; Publishing Perspectives</title>
		<link>http://publishingperspectives.com/2009/12/bonus-material-is-posthumously-publishing-unfinished-work-fair-to-the-author/comment-page-1/#comment-3160</link>
		<dc:creator>After Six Years, Germany&#8217;s KiWi Cashes In on Infinite Jest &#124; Publishing Perspectives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishingperspectives.com/?p=8770#comment-3160</guid>
		<description>[...] BONUS:Is Posthumously Publishing Unfinished Work Fair to the Author? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BONUS:Is Posthumously Publishing Unfinished Work Fair to the Author? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

